Oliver looking over the couch

shingle day

A friend who works in the commercial side of the road building industry made it possible for us to get the stones for the glasshouse... we are very grateful.

The condition was that we had to pick it up this week as he is tied up for a while after that.

No problem... two trips in a hired tandem trailor (able to hold about a tonne of shingle) to the pit did the job. One pile is larger stones, and one pile is smaller ones... the reasons will emerge as the project gets underway.

The stones are stored until needed - I think there is a surplus but there is a hen house to build so the design for that might be altered to use the materials on hand.

the coolest wee dude in our lives (so far!)

Oliver showing very good taste

Look at this wee cute guy chewing on an extremely tasteful CD!

glasshouse 2

Sam and I had a dig around for an hour today, clearing the site for the glasshouse and shifting the potatoes (carefully!) so that they wouldn't be where the building will take place.

The slight slope will make it challenging with the foundations with something like a 40cm drop to contend with. I have an idea of how to do it, so we will see...

I had some useful conversations with staff at Bunnings - a great chap in the paint department gave me pointers on the importance of getting the foundations and framing right to cover for freak winds - he has made his own glasshouse (but not using river stones!), and a chap in the buildings supplies department was helpful on the quantities of wood etc for the foundations - especially the spacing. Consequently on Saturday I purchased 7 metres of 100x100 timber (H4 grade) and some pre-mix concrete which we worked out would cost about the same as buying cement and driving to some place to purchase the builder's mix to make the concrete. We also purchased some boxing timber and the first roll of wire for the sides of the house (more on that another time). One of the problems with having timber for underground faoundation is rotting. While the H4 treatment is the answer, when wood is cut up as I will be cutting much of it into 60cm lengths, the untreated cut surface is exposed. I have had to purchase a fungicide spray to put on these surfaces. Buying tanalised timber for the foundations and framework goes against the grain somewhat - I would love to not be able to use any nasty stuff that takes away the clean-green thing I am trying to so with this project. But the cost of using other materials - macrocarpa for example is prohibitive. The concession is that no plants will be planted in anything having contact with these materials... as far as I can make out I will be able to keep these poisons out of the food chain.

I'm keeping an inventory of expenses and will publish that as time goes by.

The windows attached to the fence are part of the plan. They are stored against the fence until needed. I now have three large windows (like the one pictured) for the sides and a door with attached frame - half of these were gifted, including one frame with double-glazed glass in it - this will be used on the shady south-west facing side of the house. The windows pictured were gifted by Glenn & Anthea Livingstone from just up the road. As a gesture of thanks for the windows Anne and I will be making a donation to the Samoan folk at St Paul's Trinity Pacific in the city to help with people affected by the recent tsunami. Nancy and Allan Morgan contributed the double-glazed window and we will give them a plant voucher for their new garden in thanks. These donations will appear on the inventory as costs - I'm a great believer in honouring people's generosity as a way of encouraging people to be generous - sometimes paying it forward and sometimes paying it back in kind.

Next step: surveying, the holes dug, boxing and foundations placed.

I also scored some sheets of iron for the henhouse (next project) - I was driving past a skip full of old iron off a house roof and asked the guys of the stuff could be salvaged. I managed to find four good pieces that would fit in my vehicle. Sam and I went back for more a little while later with the trailor, but the skip had been picked up. What a waste!

Mart's glasshouse

I am about to start on the glasshouse I have designed, trying to use as many recycled products as possible to keep the costs down and save the world. I am not sure about the saving the world bit, but I think it will feel better eating tomatoes and lettuces from the glasshouse knowing that the place they grow in was made with as many re-used products as possible. Here's the site...

a week away in Hawea

a few pics from the Hawea trip... including a tree, fern and lichen from Haast Pass, Lake Hawea looking into the western reaches, and on the way home Lake Pukaki with Mt Cook (Aoraki) looking rather splendid .

Oliver 5 months

The little chappie was having some fun at our place yesterday - swinging on a bouncer thing very pleased with himself...

and a few days before he had a play with Moby the cat!

a new toy

It has been almost 21 years since I purchased my last stereo for $800 - an un-inspiring Goldstar thing, but at least it had separate components so that I could upgrade when possible, or necessary. the CD player lasted 10 years or so - the turntable was always poor, and the amp, God bless it, stood the test of time even though it was very limited. The speakers had been replaced with old trusty large wooden Akais from the rack days of the early 1980's.

Finally, thanks to a kind IRD return I have been able to upgrade. Good old Bob Brown's Hi Fi shop in Christchurch (http://www.bobbrownshifi.co.nz/) had a lovely Bose unit at an affordable price and I installed it yesterday.

What a contrast in sound!

I have yet to give it the full on blast it deserves, but a new day has dawned and I am thrilled! That it also runs DVDs and provides the sound for the TV (that I hardly ever watch) is just an added bonus.

Walter Brueggemann quote

A Love Affair With More - Walter Brueggemann
Though many of us are well intentioned, we have invested our lives in consumerism. We have a love affair with 'more'---and we will never have enough. Consumerism is not simply a marketing strategy. It has become a demonic spiritual force among us, and the theological question facing us is whether the Gospel has the power to help us withstand it.
Source: Christian Century, March 24, 1999, via Ministry of Money newsletter

Oliver is 3 months old today!

Rodney Hide's ultimatum

Silly old Rodney Hide - here's what you do when someone tries to corner you with an ultimatum (in this case Rodney has declared to the Prime Minister that if it is decided to have any 'Maori seats' on the Auckland Council and he is out as Local Government Minister) - SACK HIM NOW!

Whether there ends up being Maori seats or not (and I think there should be - this is the kind of way we honour the good principles of the Treaty of Waitangi) - he can't behave this way. He didn't get elected as the Government and he is lucky to have any voice at all. Sack him now!

And more... Hide is playing the Winston Peters game - being the populist, playing to people's prejudices... especially on race. Of course there is a constituency of people who are anti-Maori and who think that it is reasonable for the manuhiri (visitors) to dominate the tangata whenua (people of the land - Maori) - it is easy enough to build a base from these people. But Rodney has forgotten something important - he has been granted a place in the cabinet of the Government. The Government does not exist to appeal to disaffected constituents - the Government exists to serve the people - all the people. As Local Government Minister, Rodney has to look out for all NZers, and in this case, ensure that all of the people are served by leaders who will understand them. In a NZ, that means a partnership with Maori because we are in a treaty relationship. Maori should be at the table in the leadership of the proposed Auckland supercity for this is the context of NZ life - especially in a City Council that will be quite massive.

John Key, be warned - if you don't sack him now you will only have a worse Rodney on your back in a year or two. Anyway - he is a dictatorial Local Government Minister who doesn't seem to be interested in listening to the voices of those who are democratically elected to serve their towns and cities - and we need better than that. Sack him!

I'm at risk!

It hit me the other day, there is another person close to me who I would die for if there was something I could do that might prevent his being hurt.

I was holding my grandson Oliver, and I realized that the net of those who I care deeply for has spread.

Now, I don’t know what the odds are of my being killed by putting myself in harms way as a substitute for someone else, I imagine the odds are very low.

But it has just hit me that the odds of this happening have to increase the more my children breed.

Do my children realise what risk they are putting me in if they think of having children?

Oliver is the only grandchild so far – I think I have a good chance of not meeting an unfortunate end protecting him – but I need to talk to my children about what they are doing to my chances of a long life if they have any more children, for I know that if an out of control car was heading towards anyone in my family circle I would do what I could to protect them, even if that meant shielding them from the worst of the impact. I wouldn’t think about it – there wouldn’t be time – I would just do it.

I know I would give my life for any of them because to a degree I already have.

I am sure that my life has already been shortened by a few years through the fear and anxiety I have suffered as my children have weathered the storms of life.

When I am not thinking of my life ending prematurely, because of out of control motor vehicles careering towards them, I figure that a few years less life at the end of my life when I might be frail and more incoherent than I am now might not be the worst thing – so I suffer this possibility accordingly and hope for a good number of years yet.

But the addition of Oliver into the family circle has got me worried. I am now at risk!

John Boyne's The House of Special Purpose

I've just finished reading this - a good story offering a perspective on the fall of the Romanov dynasty in Russia from a servant who escaped to England and built a life. While some aspects of the story (the identity of his wife, for example) were kind of obvious fairly early on, and the outcome was kind of heralded at the start simply because of the decision to mix the time frames up, it was very enjoyable and informative.

more reading

Someone sent me a book voucher - what a joy!

Along with The Shack Anne and I purchased Carlo's Ruiz Zafon's fantastic novel The Angel's Game. We read The Shadow of the Wind last year and loved the clever storyline (set in Barcelona) and the quite wonderful characters. The Angel's Game keeps up the fine tradition. It is set in an earlier time and briefly involves two characters who appeared in Shadow...

I number these books among the best novels I have read - they are gripping mysteries told by a craftsman author who brings Barcelona alive and offers up fascinating characters.

The Shack

I read this remarkable book while up at Hanmer Springs (hot pools in the Canterbury foothills) with the youth group. I can't think of a better book that depicts the way that God is One but Three in an easily accessible way than this. The practical reality and relevance of the Trinity in human life is stunningly depicted... the challenge and critique God offers to human independence is quite wonderfully crafted in the story, and the impressive 'slam-dunking' of the way we presume to judge others (and presume to know how God does) remains for me the highlight of the book.

It is a must read!

Anne and I are beginning to gather a bunch of copies for study groups at St Stephen's - it will be fun!

I commented to a friend that I believe that this story will promote the relevance of Trinitarian Theology in human life more than any other book ever written simply because it is so accessible.

http://theshackbook.com/aimages/bookmarkad.jpg

oliver coming along nicely

Here is the wee fella at 7 weeks old - growing nicely!

the referendum (again)

My earlier comment referring to Jesus not advocating violence in any form might get a rise from someone... is smacking violence?

I'm saying that smacking is violence - and in the case of adults smacking children, it is in the realm of the worse kind of violence (even if in most cases it is a relatively mild form of it).

Let me explain myself...

1. violence in my view is when one inflicts pain on another using force

2. the violence can take various forms, e.g physical and verbal

3. there are different levels of violence - some are minor some are major, but they are still acts of violence

4. I believe it is better to use this violence as a defining term in relation to this issue rather than smacking because of the ambiguity surrounding the way people talk of smacking. A smack can mean different things to different people... one person's idea of a smack could be a light use of the hand, someone else's idea of a smack might be a forceful striking... both can be regarded as a smack but the effects of them quite different. The values of the people involved are vastly different even though the same term is used.

5. smacking, especially using one's hand against a child is a dangerous form of violence. The adult is stronger and has little idea of the impact of their hand on the body of a child. Smacking with a hand has an impact on the deep tissue of a child rather than on the surface tissue where there might be a momentary sting but no lasting tissue damage. If a parent used a plastic ruler as an alternative, the damage to deep tissue is greatly minimised, but please be clear, I am not advocating this form of smacking either, because...

6. the violence involved when one individual is clearly dominant over the other is of the worse kind of violence. It is bullying, it is intimidating, it is abusive, and it violates the other. It is the worst possible example of 'good' parenting that we can give to our children, for it suggests that violence is an appropriate way of handling conflict. The Gospel way of handling conflict is completely opposite - forgiveness, turning the other cheek, 'blessed are the peacemakers,' serving, humility, and thereby inspiring love

7. Finally, I believe (with Leunig below) that violence begets violence. Often I have seen a child who has been hit then hit out at whoever is further down the power 'chain' than them. Smacking a child perpetuates the myth that violence sorts something out. Where do we get this idea from? I can admit that there is a case for some violent intervention to stop the violent abuse of another - e.g. the overthrowing of the Nazi regime etc etc - but that is not to imply that this sorts everything out... it creates a whole new set of problems and it escalates other forms of violence... the violence involved in the carpet-bombing of the civilians of Dresden and Tokyo, and the dropping of nuclear bombs on the civilians of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a level of violence far in advance of the violence the allies were attempting to quell... wars have not ceased... the arms race has escalated and not reduced as a result of the allies 'winning' WW2... etc etc

the referendum

In NZ we have a citizens initiated referendum before us on the issue of child discipline.
The referendum is on the question: “Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?”

Already the main Government parties have criticised the ambiguity of the wording and indicated that they will not be acting on the outcome of this non-binding referenda anyway. So, at one level it is a waste of time - yet at another, it gives us something to talk about.

I like the way Joanne Black in this week's NZ Listener indicated that she will be too busy washing her hair to participate in the postal referendum being conducted over the months of July and August!

What is hugely disappointing for me in this debate (of several years now) is the role many Christians are playing in it. The most vocal advocates for smacking children are prominent Christians. I find this to be a deeply disturbing departure from the teachings of Christ, whose Beatitudes, (Matthew 5) among other teachings, do not advocate for violence in any way whatsoever.

There are a couple of websites set up around this issue for people to reflect on... one for a YES vote and one for a NO vote.
http://yesvote.org.nz/ is more to my liking even though I think the presumption of 'good' in the referendum is dumb
The other site is http://www.voteno.org.nz/ and is fronted by Simon Barnett, a prominent broadcaster who is Christian.
Here's an article I enjoyed written by a Napier City Councillor... tp://yesvote.org.nz/2009/06/19/baldock-balks-when-asked-for-proof/

The Church's Primary Task

I receive a daily email from http://www.inwardoutward.org/

Today's quote from John Howard Yoder's The Politics of Jesus on the church seems pertinent in a season where everyone seems to be running around trying to make the church bigger when the primary task is that it lives unfettered by consumerist notions of what is successful.

"The very existence of the church is her primary task. It is in itself a proclamation of the Lordship of Christ to the powers from whose dominion the church has begun to be liberated. The church does not attack the powers; this Christ has done. The church concentrates upon not being seduced by them."